Comments on: Cracking the Vault: An Alternate Workflow http://www.civil3d.com/2006/10/cracking-the-vault-an-alternate-workflow/ Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:08:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: John Lowe http://www.civil3d.com/2006/10/cracking-the-vault-an-alternate-workflow/#comment-44948 John Lowe Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:15:14 +0000 http://www.civil3d.com/index.php/2006/10/cracking-the-vault-an-alternate-workflow/#comment-44948 This seemed like a good idea... "Next time, the real work begins: what drawings do we make, and what goes in them? I’ll detail the drawings we use to make each sheet, and begin outlining a table of drawings that make up our project." Did this eventually become the Autodesk white paper with the chart of Xrefs in it? This seemed like a good idea…
“Next time, the real work begins: what drawings do we make, and what goes in them? I’ll detail the drawings we use to make each sheet, and begin outlining a table of drawings that make up our project.”
Did this eventually become the Autodesk white paper with the chart of Xrefs in it?

]]> By: John Postlewait http://www.civil3d.com/2006/10/cracking-the-vault-an-alternate-workflow/#comment-356 John Postlewait Tue, 17 Oct 2006 23:14:54 +0000 http://www.civil3d.com/index.php/2006/10/cracking-the-vault-an-alternate-workflow/#comment-356 <p>BBoyd ran your computer for a while today putting everything in one DWT.<br /> Add another WOW.</p> <p><em>JW: BBoyd is one of the great pilot project team members at GBA and "[my] computer" is running that SP3 that is supposed to be under NDA, and yet it's mentioned all over the place. I removed some of JP's comment that referred to things that are for now outside the conversation. Hope he'll forgive me.</em></p> BBoyd ran your computer for a while today putting everything in one DWT.
Add another WOW.

<em>JW: BBoyd is one of the great pilot project team members at GBA and “[my] computer” is running that SP3 that is supposed to be under NDA, and yet it’s mentioned all over the place. I removed some of JP’s comment that referred to things that are for now outside the conversation. Hope he’ll forgive me.</em>

]]> By: James Wedding, P.E. http://www.civil3d.com/2006/10/cracking-the-vault-an-alternate-workflow/#comment-354 James Wedding, P.E. Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:00:05 +0000 http://www.civil3d.com/index.php/2006/10/cracking-the-vault-an-alternate-workflow/#comment-354 Don, I managed to delete your comment somehow, but I would typically consider SWPPP plans under the guise of erosion control. In my past experience, we were always able to use the Plat, Grading, and EC sheets as the supporting docs in our SWPPP submittals, without the need for additional plans. Don,
I managed to delete your comment somehow, but I would typically consider SWPPP plans under the guise of erosion control. In my past experience, we were always able to use the Plat, Grading, and EC sheets as the supporting docs in our SWPPP submittals, without the need for additional plans.

]]> By: SEmerick http://www.civil3d.com/2006/10/cracking-the-vault-an-alternate-workflow/#comment-352 SEmerick Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:46:05 +0000 http://www.civil3d.com/index.php/2006/10/cracking-the-vault-an-alternate-workflow/#comment-352 Maybe I missed it in the post, but were you planning to leverage Sheet Set Manager for your CD set? I'm interested to know if/how SSM can be used alongside Vault. Thanks for all the good info! <em>JW: We will hit that a bit later in the process. The short answer is that SSM works fine for publishing and pushing information back to the dwg, it just can't be used for file navigation.</em> Maybe I missed it in the post, but were you planning to leverage Sheet Set Manager for your CD set? I’m interested to know if/how SSM can be used alongside Vault. Thanks for all the good info!

JW: We will hit that a bit later in the process. The short answer is that SSM works fine for publishing and pushing information back to the dwg, it just can’t be used for file navigation.

]]>