<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cracking the Vault: Paving Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.civil3d.com/2006/10/vault-paving-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.civil3d.com/2006/10/vault-paving-design/</link>
	<description>Home of Raider Consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:27:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Currey</title>
		<link>http://www.civil3d.com/2006/10/vault-paving-design/comment-page-1/#comment-522</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Currey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.civil3d.com/index.php/2006/10/vault-paving-design/#comment-522</guid>
		<description>This is making me feel pretty good about myself. Itâ€™s basically the same workflow that I have come to after refining it over several projects. I started out thinking that I definitely needed a separate drawing for each corridor, and maybe a separate drawing for each alignment &amp; profile (otherwise Iâ€™d spend more time recovering files than working on my design). That took way too much work just to keep the drawings straight, and matching up intersections was a nightmare. Then I moved to placing all of my alignments in one drawing, and all of my corridors in one drawing. That was better, but it still was too much work to update a corridor after modifying a profile. So now all alignments, profiles, and corridors are in one drawing. Composite corridor surface is â€œdrefâ€™dâ€ out for grading &amp; utilities. And with SP2, stability has not been an issue.

Thanks James for taking the time to share this with the masses.

&lt;em&gt;JW: Make sure you get your hands on SP3 as soon as it&#039;s available. The speed improvements in DREFs and Corridors alone will blow you away. It&#039;s a must have for real work!&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is making me feel pretty good about myself. Itâ€™s basically the same workflow that I have come to after refining it over several projects. I started out thinking that I definitely needed a separate drawing for each corridor, and maybe a separate drawing for each alignment &#038; profile (otherwise Iâ€™d spend more time recovering files than working on my design). That took way too much work just to keep the drawings straight, and matching up intersections was a nightmare. Then I moved to placing all of my alignments in one drawing, and all of my corridors in one drawing. That was better, but it still was too much work to update a corridor after modifying a profile. So now all alignments, profiles, and corridors are in one drawing. Composite corridor surface is â€œdrefâ€™dâ€ out for grading &#038; utilities. And with SP2, stability has not been an issue.</p>
<p>Thanks James for taking the time to share this with the masses.</p>
<p><em>JW: Make sure you get your hands on SP3 as soon as it&#8217;s available. The speed improvements in DREFs and Corridors alone will blow you away. It&#8217;s a must have for real work!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana Breig Probert, EIT</title>
		<link>http://www.civil3d.com/2006/10/vault-paving-design/comment-page-1/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana Breig Probert, EIT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 01:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.civil3d.com/index.php/2006/10/vault-paving-design/#comment-520</guid>
		<description>There are a lot of X&#039;s in Texas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a lot of X&#8217;s in Texas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
